MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,068
95% 805 Pts
64-Core 2,240
139% 2,240 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 196
Parallax 189
146% 188 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 188
Splatting 130
123% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
34GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,030
Write 1,436
Mixed 616
299% 1,361 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 56.6
224% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 817
695% 1,010 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
389GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 195 338 208 275 271 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 153
Write 88.6
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 270
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 11
46% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 14
11% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 102%
SABRENT 1TB
606GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1764 944 964 1015 892 895 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 97 52 48 58 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 89.2
Write 52.8
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 82.3
107% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 32%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3733 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $966
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback