Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 16:48
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5775C-$170
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 213
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 556
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
Asus(1043 0519) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1431 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 64
Parallax 93.9
56% 75.7 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 47.6
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
457GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 671 659 661 671 664 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 581
Write 656
Mixed 613
SusWrite 663
142% 628 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 62.8
208% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 795
584% 765 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 162%
Great: 310%
DAS TerraMaster 5TB
519GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 73 73 73 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 148
Write 136
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 74.6
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
21% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
247GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 66 67 67 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 123
Write 132
Mixed 102
SusWrite 68.3
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 1TB
123GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 52 52 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 85.2
Write 90.8
Mixed 60
SusWrite 51.7
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 88%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
161GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 54 53 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 98.8
Write 101
Mixed 67
SusWrite 52.8
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
291GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 66 66 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 138
Write 138
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 66.4
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.8
244% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 4TB
346GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 67 68 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 141
Write 144
Mixed 95
SusWrite 68.2
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 92%
DAS TerraMaster 6TB
400GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 68 68 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 137
Write 125
Mixed 106
SusWrite 69.4
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 112%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
279GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 74 72 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 104
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 73.7
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 127%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 1TB
114GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.8 9.1 9.4 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 38.3
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 9.3
21% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
163% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 78%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 500GB
18GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.8 9.2 9.4 9.4 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 34
Write 39.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 9.2
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 65%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 8.8 9.2 9.4 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 34.7
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 9.2
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 63%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 1TB
355GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.8 9.2 9.4 9.4 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 9.2
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 30.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 21.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 3,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback