Asrock H410M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 11:20
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$64
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 229
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 671
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 5
4% 4.83 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APE13PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 43 88 59 73 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 263
Write 153
Mixed 192
SusWrite 80.3
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 11.1
90% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 99.9
106% 179 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 99%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
147GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 159 162 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 148
Mixed 103
SusWrite 161
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
250% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 105%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 32GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 10 4.8 4.8 6.7 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Read 31.6
Write 19.1
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.2
18% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2356WS.001 Kingston 9905713-030.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.6% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HDV Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback