HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory45.4 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '17 at 02:46
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 709
63% 532 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
EVGA(3842 1480) 1.5GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 26.5
20% 29.1 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 27.7
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69% Good
Read 268
Write 214
Mixed 220
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 35.5
120% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 98
95% 152 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 124
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.71
153% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 86%
HP DF0450B8054 450GB
412GB free
Firmware: HPD5
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 164
Mixed 161
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.37
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.81
171% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 95%
HP DF0450B8054 450GB
130GB free
Firmware: HPD1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 136
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.86
159% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback