Today's hottest deals

Medion MD34140/2563

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion MD34140/2563  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B350A4-EM
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 19:04
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 232
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 609
68% 532 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 21.9
11% 21 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 20
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12-256G-PHISON- 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12A1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 900 308 303 303 301 248 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,902
Write 998
Mixed 996
SusWrite 394
237% 1,072 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 52.8
166% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 709
518% 678 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 182%
Great: 196%
Toshiba HDWJ105 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 115 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 102
Write 109
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 114
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5713-001.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 21.3
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34140/2563 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MD34140/2563

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback