Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 06:09
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 142
60% 99 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 418
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.4% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 107
Parallax 161
79% 122 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 115
Splatting 74.8
75% 93.4 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$33
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 92 77 55 53 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 441
Write 320
Mixed 158
SusWrite 89.2
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 14.4
58% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 13.1
28% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
296GB free
Firmware: 0005LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 114 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 114
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 9905403-408.A00LF Kingston 9905403-408.A00LF 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback