Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory119 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMar 28 '22 at 09:21
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
75% 139 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 920
82% 692 Pts
64-Core 2,240
139% 2,240 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 183
Parallax 172
135% 174 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 179
Splatting 125
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 467
Mixed 369
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 45.8
147% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 329
256% 351 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Asmt 2135 500GB
432GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 116 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 111
Write 103
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 114
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
Lacie 2big RAID 14TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1352
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 141 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 202
SusWrite 138
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.4
1,603% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85%
Great: 150%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
116GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 86.5
Write 77.5
Mixed 68
SusWrite 81.8
106% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 4.3
279% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 60.7
MC Write 56.9
MC Mixed 58.3
168% 58.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 24.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 148%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $979
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback