Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 339
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.46% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 8.4
7% 9.73 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.6
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 500GB-$124
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 127 138 163 158 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 166
Mixed 107
SusWrite 149
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.6
326% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 113%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB
337GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 18 21 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 45.4
Write 47
Mixed 32
SusWrite 20.4
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 90%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB
314GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 25 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.44% Terrible
Read 7.8
Write 33.3
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 24.4
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.44%
Great: 90%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB
54GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 24 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 53.2
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 25.7
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16%
Great: 90%
LSI Logical Volume 16TB
14.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 18 18 14 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 51.2
Write 15.6
Mixed 8
SusWrite 16.2
16% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 137%
LSI Logical Volume 299GB
276GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 171
Write 54.3
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 56.4
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
1GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 12.9
Mixed 12
SusWrite 10.6
17% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
37GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 18
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 16.5
25% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.3
119% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 29.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback