HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 23:09
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 422
54% 408 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 165 76 77 76 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
465GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 117 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 121
Write 113
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 116
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 69%
Wilk 16GB
11GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 41 43 41 42 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 124
Write 36.6
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 37.1
58% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
105% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback