Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70 18,839 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Memory 47.5 1-Core 44.5 2-Core 93.3 36% 61.8 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 183 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 18.8 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 23.4 15% 20.1 fps	MRender 13.4 Gravity 17.1 Splatting 12.2 12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor S TM380811AS 80GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 10 15 27 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 44 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 17.6 22% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 42%
Maxtor S TM380211AS 80GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 16GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 43 45 46 44 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 59.1 Write 10.7 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 44.4 26% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 10.3 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.8 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	5x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+AMDBench 31%, 2,693 samples	2x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 6150NvidiaBench 0%, 477 samples	5x
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	3x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
SU 800 256GBAdataBench 81%, 336 samples	1x
GP-GSTFS311 120GBGigabyteBench 30%, 201 samples	1x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $155