Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82C7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82C7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 20:38
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 181
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 247
35% 256 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.07 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11010C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 998
Write 919
Mixed 934
212% 951 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.4
206% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 709
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 530
437% 626 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 176%
Cirago USB 3.0 500GB
359GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 144 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 144
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 142
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MJ86H9F-3200 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C7 Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback