Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 22:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 321
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 45.1
29% 37 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 33.2
31% 39 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-120 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T181207
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 189 194 194 189 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 205
Write 189
Mixed 195
SusWrite 193
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 19.7
72% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 23.4
21% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
462GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 119 118 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 125
Write 113
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback