Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 23:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 91
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 182
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 90.1
55% 74.1 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 47.6
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 151 157 165 164 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62% Good
Read 301
Write 238
Mixed 261
SusWrite 156
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 30.2
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 147
126% 182 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 89%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
971GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64% Good
Read 164
Write 159
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 59
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 118%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
784GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 59 59 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 85.9
Write 93.3
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 58.8
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.2
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback