Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C13
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 17:47
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 382
55% 402 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.9 1.6 3.6 2.5 2.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 42.5
Write 22.7
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 2.6
9% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 9.4
106% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 3.1
37% 81.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 74%
Ccboot iSCSI 64GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.5 1.6 3.4 3.3 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 3.9
3% 4.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 34%
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB
99GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.7 1.7 3.6 3.5 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 3
6% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 26
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 25
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13) Builds (Compare 925 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback