Today's hottest deals

MSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 08:51
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 67.6
41% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 214
21% 173 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 27
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 37.4
22% 30.7 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 20
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 378 379 383 299 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 323
Write 403
Mixed 356
SusWrite 337
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 37.2
118% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 126
115% 177 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 10.8
24% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640) - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $581
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback