Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardMSI A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 14:26
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 590
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 813
50% 813 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 91.3
55% 74.1 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 47.3
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,359
Write 804
Mixed 854
222% 1,005 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 59.8
200% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 215
220% 350 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
89GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 409
Mixed 255
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 43.6
143% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 257
143% 133 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 35.3
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback