PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160531 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 20 '22 at 06:26 |
Run Duration | 192 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8310
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
64.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team T253X1120G 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 204 70 70 69 70 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
86GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 150 154 154 156 MB/s
|
85.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 66 78 86 87 82 MB/s
|
49%
Average
|
|||
USB Disk 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.2 9.3 9.3 9 8.6 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KH318C10F/4 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 195x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
FX-8320AMD $203Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $195 |