Today's hottest deals

HP 635 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 635 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3577
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 23:48
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 49
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 30.8
24% 32.3 Pts
4-Core 28.7
8-Core 31.9
4% 30.3 Pts
64-Core 29.8
2% 29.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 52 49 46 61 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 81.8
Write 84.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 51.8
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.5
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 635 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 635 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback