Lenovo 20BHS1VP00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20BHS1VP00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BHS1VP00
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '17 at 23:32
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 336
38% 295 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 7.16
4% 6.75 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 8.61
6% 6.49 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 499
Write 344
Mixed 351
88% 398 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 23.3
116% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 74
98% 181 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
601GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 94.5
Write 116
Mixed 116
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.25
72% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 70%
SD 130GB
107GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
Read 87.3
Write 38.8
Mixed 44.5
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.12
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.76
274% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 37%
PNY U3 1TB
126GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 53.1
Write 53.6
Mixed 19
51% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.17
54% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback