Today's hottest deals

Asus Q302UA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus Q302UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q302UA
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime33.7 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 16:35
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 122
57% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 194
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1CAD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 8.3
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
1% 2.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SE0OA4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 52 57 45 82 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 7.5
Write 15.7
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 59.7
16% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 0112 76.A305G.C5G0B 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q302UA Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q302UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback