Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 08:01
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 411
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 55.9
43% 56.4 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 58.8
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 161GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.1 2.2 2.4 2 3.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.79% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 2.4
4% 5.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 24%
Ccboot iSCSI 2TB
143GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Read 11
Write 2.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 2.7
5% 6.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
156% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 38%
Ccboot iSCSI 2TB
184GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2 2.1 2.4 2.4 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Read 9.2
Write 5
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 2.3
4% 6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power SP008GBLFU213B02 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.8
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback