Today's hottest deals

Packard Easynote TJ65

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard Easynote TJ65  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50MV
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090928
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 16:55
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 86.1
44% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 86.5
8-Core 89.9
12% 88.2 Pts
64-Core 23.5
2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M
Acer(1025 0219) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 7
Parallax 1.3
2% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.8
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 54 3.5 21 75 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 238
Write 176
Mixed 178
SusWrite 59.6
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 9.8
46% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 12.6
31% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 4
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Easynote TJ65 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard Easynote TJ65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback