Asrock H55DE3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H55DE3  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 01:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 152
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 281
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X300/X550/X1050
Sapphire(174B 1490) 128MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.6
0% 0.35 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3120813AS 120GB-$98
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 25 34 45 46 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 49.1
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 39.5
32% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 32%
3Q External USB 3.0 500GB
40GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 29
Write 23.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 23.5
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55DE3 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H55DE3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback