bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '17 at 20:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.5% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 166
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 331
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 966GB
433GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 268
Write 253
Mixed 262
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 14.4
64% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 26.3
DQ Mixed 59.8
35% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 72%
Vmware Virtual disk 966GB
418GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 246
Mixed 176
152% 202 MB/s
4K Read 3.23
4K Write 2.68
4K Mixed 0.59
250% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Vmware Virtual disk 966GB
141GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 249
Mixed 193
159% 212 MB/s
4K Read 4.21
4K Write 3.73
4K Mixed 0.54
304% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 127%
Great: 123%
Vmware Virtual disk 28GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 246
Mixed 176
147% 196 MB/s
4K Read 4.26
4K Write 3.13
4K Mixed 0.59
301% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 64 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 29.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback