Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 03 '17 at 05:21
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 88.3
47% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 266
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
MSI(1462 3050) 2GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.9.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 38.8
26% 33.5 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 33.9
24% 28.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 98.7
Mixed 96.3
72% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.46
103% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HUA721075KLA 750GB
213GB free
Firmware: GK8O Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 64.4
Write 11.9
Mixed 20
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.34
80% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U64F9333G F6451U64F9333G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback