Today's hottest deals

Samsung 930QAA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 930QAA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT930QAA-K716A
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 16:31
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 92%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 80.5
42% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 190
18% 151 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Sanyo(144D C15F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8730
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70K1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 265 276 273 267 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,001
Write 862
Mixed 577
SusWrite 301
153% 685 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 39.7
105% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 254
191% 260 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 104%
Great: 236%
SDHC Card 32GB
23GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 14 13 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 31.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 12.1
28% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.4
171% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930QAA Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 930QAA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback