Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq dc5750 Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A64h
Memory1.5 GB free of 3.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 17:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 90.5
41% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 86.2
8-Core 83.9
11% 85.1 Pts
64-Core 84.5
5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Asus(1043 8245) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.8
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$100
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 133 82 90 96 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 226
Write 186
Mixed 179
SusWrite 114
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 30.6
101% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 42.9
35% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
284GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 72 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 70.9
Write 53
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 76.2
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512, 512, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5750 Microtower Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback