Lenovo 80F0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80F0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo B50-45
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 12:54
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Memory 32.2
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 37.5
19% 29.7 Pts
4-Core 38.4
8-Core 38.8
5% 38.6 Pts
64-Core 38.8
2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3800) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E660 320GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBZBG00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 39 36 32 41 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 16
Write 45.6
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 41.4
22% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170MK58F8F1600 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.6
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 0.3
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.33 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80F0 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80F0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback