Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 15:04
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$34
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 208
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 322
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A15) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 7.2
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.4
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 48 57 46 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 48.5
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
227GB free
Firmware: 0-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 75 78 76 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 74.1
Write 81.4
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 75.3
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback