Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 14:41
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 245
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 773
73% 605 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 191
Parallax 211
152% 196 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 193
Splatting 130
124% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 715 441 450 443 436 439 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,371
Write 1,222
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 487
230% 1,026 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 76
266% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,106
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 722
594% 857 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 208%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
90GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 279 223 221 213 217 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 430
Mixed 449
SusWrite 253
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 51.9
170% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
580GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 125 124 128 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 67
Write 47.2
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 124
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.7
293% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$73
612GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 108 109 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 108
Write 115
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 107
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 27.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $1,004
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback