Today's hottest deals

Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 10:59
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 161
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 618
55% 464 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 63.5
54% 66.9 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 55.7
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN512NVMe-M.2/80 512GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 541 799 1034 610 813 806 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,811
Write 1,151
Mixed 1,012
SusWrite 767
264% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 39.1
155% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 436
327% 439 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 186%
Great: 245%
Apacer AST280 240GB
66GB free
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 226 226 225 226 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.9% Good
Read 242
Write 212
Mixed 189
SusWrite 225
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 31.1
104% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 144
119% 169 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 103%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
154GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 82 81 72 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 88.5
Write 84.1
Mixed 70
SusWrite 80.1
18% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 8.5
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 23%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
177GB free
Firmware: 2BC10007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 52 59 58 62 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 48.6
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 58.2
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
163GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 29.1
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 15.1
18% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.4
139% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 71%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB
526GB free
Firmware: 0143
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 32
Write 24.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 15.4
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ 36JSZF51272PZ 36JSZF51272PZ 36JSZF51272PY 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback