Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '17 at 08:02
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 50
2-Core 99
49% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 98.3
8-Core 95.9
13% 97.1 Pts
64-Core 98.1
6% 98.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.03
1% 1.08 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA 1TB-$54
637GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 117
Write 102
Mixed 101
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.33
66% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS542580K9S 80GB
71GB free
Firmware: BBBO Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.89% Terrible
Read 26.8
Write 7.57
Mixed 7.92
10% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.17
41% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.89%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10600CL9-2GBNT0 F3-10600CL9-2GBNT0 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback