Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH541
Memory14.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '22 at 05:56
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 78
1-Core 26
2-Core 52.2
38% 52.1 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 152
17% 134 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 2008) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 191
Parallax 122
82% 138 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 104
Splatting 111
98% 122 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 102%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2008) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 8.3
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.5
8% 9.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-GD1024 1TB
499GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C5A0903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1044 463 379 262 149 0.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,519
Write 257
Mixed 770
SusWrite 383
160% 732 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 45.5
178% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 694
522% 706 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 170%
Great: 246%
Blackbox Plus 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 14.6
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 14.2
15% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 25.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 19.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback