PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition - Late 2019 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Razer CH541 |
Memory | 14.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20190918 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | May 28 '22 at 05:56 |
Run Duration | 195 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
49.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 2008) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
87.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2008) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
|
6.5%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
77.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 90%, 562 samples | 25x |
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |