Today's hottest deals

Asus CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830-8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830-8  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 28 '22 at 13:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 357
45% 344 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420
HP(103C 1162) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 213 208 204 201 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 346
Write 207
Mixed 216
SusWrite 209
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 27.8
94% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 168
140% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 129%
Sobetter Ext 1TB
99GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.86% Terrible
Read 33.4
Write 28.6
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 30
6% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
2% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830-8 Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Asus CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830-8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback