Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 35.9 2-Core 71.8 40% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 71.5 8-Core 71.8 10% 71.7 Pts	64-Core 72.3 4% 72.3 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
System 160GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 107 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 106 Write 106 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 107 69% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 61%
General 8GB 265 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 9.2 9.3 9.3 6.8 9.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	6.31% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 5.8 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 8.3 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	12x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $100Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	7x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	5x

SSD
Force GT 120GBCorsair $155Bench 69%, 13,464 samples	7x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $477