Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 189%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 13:52
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 173
2-Core 332
105% 196 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,106
103% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,536
95% 1,536 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$709
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 253
Parallax 292
230% 276 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 236
Splatting 172
191% 243 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2413 918 910 941 952 941 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2871
Write 3,008
Mixed 2,775
SusWrite 1,179
552% 2,458 MB/s
4K Read 78.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 92.2
299% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,405
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 620
561% 876 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 325%
Great: 429%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
527GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3165 2327 1837 1859 1866 1869 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,667
Write 2,936
Mixed 2790
SusWrite 2,154
595% 2,637 MB/s
4K Read 75.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 91.4
292% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,514
DQ Write 594
DQ Mixed 782
650% 963 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 376%
Great: 477%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
492GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 449 453 451 451 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 444
Mixed 425
SusWrite 451
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 55.7
179% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 220
165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 113%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
802GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 449 453 451 451 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 445
Mixed 430
SusWrite 451
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 56
181% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 220
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 114%
Great: 137%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 9402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 177 180 180 180 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 130
Write 161
Mixed 102
SusWrite 178
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.9
399% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 121 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 133
Mixed 66
SusWrite 119
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 103%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 233 245 219 229 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 225
Mixed 123
SusWrite 233
148% 202 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 1.2
369% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D40BEEAK.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 41.1
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 43.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $217

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback