Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 15:00
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 144
57% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 436
43% 353 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.5% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 86.9
52% 71.3 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 70
Splatting 47
48% 60.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 240GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1c62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 100 163 228 218 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 298
Write 197
Mixed 101
SusWrite 162
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 19.7
70% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 49.9
58% 100 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 102%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 60.6
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 100
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback