Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 22:02
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$70
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 156
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 265
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7B84) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 7.1
4% 6.67 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 10.3
6% 7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 50 7.2 37 140 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 437
Write 337
Mixed 308
SusWrite 86.8
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 17.2
71% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 29.5
32% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback