HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 13:00
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 614
66% 525 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5
4% 5.33 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN15ABHA 512GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6T3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 398 396 385 401 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 368
Mixed 314
SusWrite 396
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 49
179% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 227
193% 284 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-000H1 128GB
79GB free
Firmware: BXW74H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 642 645 645 627 642 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,434
Write 661
Mixed 684
SusWrite 642
190% 856 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 52.8
191% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 368
354% 584 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 186%
Great: 196%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 25.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback