Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Late 2020) - RZ09-0327

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Late 2020) - RZ09-0327 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY350
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210329
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '22 at 21:57
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1165G7 51,565 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 62 1-Core 138 2-Core 209 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 311 40% 303 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 1006) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 14.4 Reflection 47.9 Parallax 11 12% 24.4 fps	MRender 16.6 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 12.4 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB 7,447 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 846 949 731 720 788 776 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 916 Write 980 Mixed 771 SusWrite 802 195% 867 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 87 4K Mixed 58.2 194% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 716 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 608 421% 535 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 316%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB 9,706 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 57.8 MC Mixed 38 127% 44.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 16.4 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 (Late 2020) - RZ09-0327 Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Late 2020) - RZ09-0327

CPU
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples	286x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	171x
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 38%, 3,536 samples	92x
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	4x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	113x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 7,447 samples	76x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	35x

RAM
UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GBSamsungBench 108%, 9,706 samples	246x
53E1G32D4NQ 8x2GBMicronBench 119%, 308 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $298	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350