Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory12 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 12:20
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 171
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 277
32% 249 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 36 36 35 32 31 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.7% Very poor
Read 57.7
Write 48.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 33
11% 49 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 14
40% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 9.6
9% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 94GB
85GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 28 27 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 8.5
Write 47
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 27.5
16% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 14GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 13312 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 36.7
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 27.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback