Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 181 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 361 36% 293 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.55 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 4 Splatting 3 3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
KingFast 128GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0317A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.6 9.8 4.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$29 5,893 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01K02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 146 150 151 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 163 Write 137 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 150 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 14GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.9 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,185x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	983x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	933x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	226x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	158x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16