Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH317-53

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Alphard_CFS
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 19:39
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 720
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 851
53% 851 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1342) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 97.5
Parallax 7.6
6% 37.3 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10121000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,160
Write 1,642
Mixed 1,406
316% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.7
186% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 832
629% 849 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 220%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
696GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 160 159 167 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 101
Write 145
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 161
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-53 Builds (Compare 1,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback