Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14C1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 68% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star Prestige 14 A10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-14C1  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 02:00
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 68%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10710U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 73.6
35% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 112
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 1297) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 11
Parallax 48.6
24% 29.8 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 45.8
36% 43.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADXA0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 848
Write 324
Mixed 83.4
90% 418 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 22.1
106% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 145
111% 155 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NVD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 37%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-14C1 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14C1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback