Today's hottest deals

MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 02:16
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 202
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 568
53% 440 Pts
64-Core 720
44% 720 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Lighting 93.8
Reflection 92.3
Parallax 93.9
76% 93.3 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 81.9
Splatting 74.1
72% 89.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G-1101 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20290001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 860
Write 683
Mixed 272
133% 605 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 57.6
192% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 255
239% 370 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 145%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
330GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 154 157 159 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 163
Mixed 20
SusWrite 154
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2OZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback