Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 00:28
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 106
2-Core 177
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 516
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 68.5
56% 70.8 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 67.9
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 49 64 75 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 159
Write 101
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 62.5
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 12.9
52% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 20.5
DQ Mixed 16
12% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
419GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 194 195 196 194 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 188
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 193
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 25
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 27.3
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter9.A01LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback