Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190730
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '22 at 14:37
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 231 76% 140 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 624 64% 515 Pts	64-Core 708 44% 708 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 3571) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.5% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 117 Parallax 94.4 89% 107 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 88.3 Splatting 90.6 81% 101 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 25GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 72 71 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 58 Mixed 11.7 SusWrite 68.4 35% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 60%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 53 46 42 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 44.7 Write 74.5 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 45.7 34% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 58%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB 8,028 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 12GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 96 96 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 84.5 Write 87.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 94.8 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 1x8GB 4,099 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.9% Below average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 14.7 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 8,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	855x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $60Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	811x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $75Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	770x

GPU
RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	806x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	461x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	433x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	362x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	192x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	175x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	270x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	199x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	154x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $425

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320