Today's hottest deals

Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 02:25
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 84.5
43% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 127
19% 137 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Sanyo(144D B063) 782MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.9
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP2504C 239GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 31 43 23 22 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 23
Write 36
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 28.4
22% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
118% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback