Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3484DDG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 3484DDG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 10:50
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 159
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 333
43% 326 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 83F4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$19
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 76 80 73 77 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 50.6
Write 44.6
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 79.6
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 69%
General UDisk 16GB
13GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 11.5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 10.4
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
101% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5040ED58E9W1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3484DDG Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3484DDG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback