| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 17 months ago.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190717 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 06 '22 at 17:30 |
| Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.3%
Very good
|
75% 132 Pts
|
68% 556 Pts
|
43% 700 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.7%
Above average
|
55% 67.8 fps
|
54% 66.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
86GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 761 705 502 435 406 MB/s
|
207%
Outstanding
|
238% 1,062 MB/s
|
226% 76.6 MB/s
|
752% 1,011 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 101 115 110 120 118 MB/s
|
59.6%
Above average
|
73% 98.4 MB/s
|
120% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
33.6%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
51% 78.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 814 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 192x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 181x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 128x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 78x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 62x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 119% - Outstanding | Total price: $260 |