Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '22 at 17:30
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 211 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 695 68% 556 Pts	64-Core 700 43% 700 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.7% Above average	Lighting 67.3 Reflection 70.3 Parallax 65.7 55% 67.8 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 65.6 54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 86GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 761 705 502 435 406 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1,360 Write 1,163 Mixed 1,116 SusWrite 606 238% 1,062 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 69.6 226% 76.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,153 DQ Write 882 DQ Mixed 998 752% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 346%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 101 115 110 120 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 108 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 107 73% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB 13,628 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 10.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	211x
Core i5-8400Intel $115Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	193x
Core i7-8700Intel $135Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	65x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $36Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	33x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	26x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $66Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 125% - Outstanding

Total price: $236

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400